Dressurprüfung Kl. S***

NO. 25

rank participants H C B sum
1
Boaventura Francisco Freire

Pferdezucht- u. RV Luhmühlen e.V.

  • H 258.5
    68.026%
  • C 275
    72.368%
  • B 262
    68.947%
  • sum 795.5
    69.781%
275
72.368%
262
68.947%
795.5
69.781%
2
Andre Hecker

RG Schillerslage e.V.

  • H 271.5
    71.447%
  • C 259
    68.158%
  • B 263
    69.211%
  • sum 793.5
    69.605%
259
68.158%
263
69.211%
793.5
69.605%

You want to see all the results in the future?

  • Huge database More than 1,7 million horses
  • Exclusive videos More than 2 Million videos
  • Tried and tested Nearly 400.000 registered members

These results are presented in full due to their topicality. If you also want to see older results, you need the Pro-Membership.

Sign up for Pro
3
Mathis Goerens

RV Sandbostel

  • H 263.5
    69.342%
  • C 261
    68.684%
  • B 265.5
    69.868%
  • sum 790
    69.298%
261
68.684%
265.5
69.868%
790
69.298%
4
Peter Koch

RV Harsefeld u.Umg.

  • H 262.5
    69.079%
  • C 265
    69.737%
  • B 262
    68.947%
  • sum 789.5
    69.254%
265
69.737%
262
68.947%
789.5
69.254%
5
Wolfhard Witte

RUF Hänigsen e.V.

  • H 263.5
    69.342%
  • C 259
    68.158%
  • B 262
    68.947%
  • sum 784.5
    68.816%
259
68.158%
262
68.947%
784.5
68.816%

not placed

rank participants H C B sum
6
Svenja Peper-Oestmann

RV Harsefeld u.Umg.

  • H 258
    67.895%
  • C 257
    67.632%
  • B 255.5
    67.237%
  • sum 770.5
    67.588%
257
67.632%
255.5
67.237%
770.5
67.588%
7
Annalena Lesch

RG Klosterhof Medingen

  • H 252.5
    66.447%
  • C 263
    69.211%
  • B 253
    66.579%
  • sum 768.5
    67.412%
263
69.211%
253
66.579%
768.5
67.412%

You want to see all the results in the future?

  • Huge database More than 1,7 million horses
  • Exclusive videos More than 2 Million videos
  • Tried and tested Nearly 400.000 registered members

These results are presented in full due to their topicality. If you also want to see older results, you need the Pro-Membership.

Sign up for Pro
8
Hendrik Baumgart

RV Aller-Weser

  • H 259.5
    68.289%
  • C 253
    66.579%
  • B 253.5
    66.711%
  • sum 766
    67.193%
253
66.579%
253.5
66.711%
766
67.193%
9
Madeleine Plinke

RFV Nienburg e. V.

  • H 251.5
    66.184%
  • C 255
    67.105%
  • B 253.5
    66.711%
  • sum 760
    66.667%
255
67.105%
253.5
66.711%
760
66.667%
10
Magdalena Preisler

RFV Isernhagen e.V.

  • H 259
    68.158%
  • C 246
    64.737%
  • B 253.5
    66.711%
  • sum 758.5
    66.535%
246
64.737%
253.5
66.711%
758.5
66.535%
11
Stefan Blanken

RV Tarmstedt

  • H 253.5
    66.711%
  • C 250
    65.789%
  • B 252.5
    66.447%
  • sum 756
    66.316%
250
65.789%
252.5
66.447%
756
66.316%
12
Anna Derlien

RFV Vörie e.V.

  • H 256.5
    67.5%
  • C 240
    63.158%
  • B 251
    66.053%
  • sum 747.5
    65.57%
240
63.158%
251
66.053%
747.5
65.57%
13
Frauke Niemann-Laue

RFV Brockhöfe

  • H 245
    64.474%
  • C 242
    63.684%
  • B 245
    64.474%
  • sum 732
    64.211%
242
63.684%
245
64.474%
732
64.211%